Today morning, I saw this news http://www.businessinsider.com/analyst-sap-headed-for-rocky-patch-2011-12 and then this article in Forbes ( written by someone in Forbes Staff, not advoice) http://www.forbes.com/sites/ericsavitz/2011/12/16/sap-merrill-downgrades/?partner=yahootix
BofA / Merrill Lynch analyst Chandramouli Sriraman downgraded the stock from Buy to Neutral. And when I checked the stock for SAP AG, it seemed to be trading about 2.6% down.
And few minutes ago, my buddy John Appleby defended SAP in his blog . http://peopleprocesstech.com/2011/12/17/sap-2011-results-analysis-the-awful-economy-is-really-going-to-hurt-financial-analysts/
Just a few days ago, I was in Boston,MA attending SAP Influencer summit. If anything, SAP executives were more bullish than usual – not less. And they have good reasons to be that way. SAP outperformed the industry, and had a great Q3. SAP also has made significant investments into the future – in-memory, mobile, cloud etc.
SAP has some of the best sales leaders on the planet, and it shows in their results. The first year of its existence, they aimed to sell 100M of HANA . And they probably will. And remember, this is the 1.0 version of HANA – something that just supports datamarts, the simplest of usecases. What I am trying to say is – it can only become better from here. Now BW works on HANA, and they are building other stuff on HANA – and eventually they will make a strong enough case for HANA that it will pull in enough money to be a material contribution to topline.
Steve Lucas told us in a public forum at the influencer summit that we should mark his words that SAP will be number 2 database vendor in 2015 by revenue. That is a pretty bold statement to make given the leadership Oracle, IBM and Microsoft has in that market. Short of SAP saying their products will not work on anything else other than SAP’s own databases – I find it hard to believe SAP will become number 2 in database market. But Steve is an amazing leader – he is on target to sell 100M of HANA this year, which is no mean feat. So he might pull it off. Seeing is believing, and I will be watching this space closely going forward.
Mobility has a good story too. SAP has not come out of the starting block quite as fast as they usually do for cloud. So they are in catchup mode for now. But with Success Factors acquisition, they should be able to catchup quickly and hopefully lead.
But the bulk of SAP’s warchest is filled from perpetual license revenue from on-premises software sale and maintenance. 22% maintenance is a gift that will keep giving for next several years. But what about new sales? I always thought this will have to die down. However, that is not what I am seeing at the moment. Several customers are still spending on big Business Suite, CRM and analytics projects – mostly due to two factors. One – these companies had a spending freeze, and are now opening up their purses. And two – there is a lot of M&A and Divestitures happening due to macro economic factors, and these need ERP spending. So while it might not look like mid 1990s – I do not expect SAP to suffer really bad. And by the time Business Suite does slow down – Analytics, Cloud and Mobility should have become mainstream. It is SAP’s game to lose – and seeing the people in charge, I don’t think they will drop the ball.
There is a bit SAP can do too to help its own cause – which is in easing off the pressure on the marketing gas pedal a bit, and focus more on execution. If you look at the blogs and speeches that came out in 2011, you would think SAP is now making billions off HANA, not that 100M they were actually targeting 🙂 .
All said, the Merrill analyst is entitled to his opinion, just as SAP, Appleby and me are entitled to ours. But any one analyst does not make or break a company’s performance in the market. What I am watching now is if any of the other big name analysts will post their advisory on SAP in line with the Merrill guy, or whether they will remain bullish. I also wish these analysts substantiated their opinions with more research so that investors can make informed decisions.
One thought on “Will the economy hurt SAP? BofA/Merrill thinks it will, I seriously doubt it”
Good article and I am enjoying seeing you and John come to SAP’s defense….who needs Forbes Advoice when they can just take you out for a few meals at the SAP Summit 🙂 Kidding of course as I have seen you two in action over the years.
I talk to the Wall Street Analysts as well and some of them have some surprisingly depth of knowledge when it comes to SAP although it is obvious that this is not the case with this BofA analysis.
I have a good friend that runs a hedge fund and asked him a few month back on an insiders perspective on Wall Street Analysts and thought you might find this interesting.
“Some of the smaller banks have to be more focused in order to win deals so they focuse on niche segments and consequently have great analysts in those niches.
That being said, my experience is that analysts only go to work on the sell side at the investment banks as a way to transition to either the buy side at a hedge fund or to move up the ladder at that bank. Being a sell side research analyst is not a career end goal for anyone I’ve ever met. It really is a grind house atmosphere with everyone working 100+ hour work weeks, everyone out to sell everyone else out at the drop of a hat to advance their own careers and the compensation is not bad by any standard but still a small fraction of what is possible at a good hedge or mutual fund. Combined with the fact that most of them get fired in the downturns you end up with a shocking amount of turnover in an already transitory environment. Even for the analysts that stay there, they often move from group to group so quickly I find it hard to believe they became experts. One friend of mine was in an “analyst class” at Merril that covered 3 different industry groups in 6 months! So he essentially only had 2 months of experience with each industry while publishing his reports….
I would venture that 85% of analysts on the sell side are trying to get out as quickly as possible and of those 85% probably half have one year or less at that role. So that leaves you with about 15% of the analysts with real in depth knowledge or skill. Those 15% are quite good and have an amazing amount of specialized industry knowledge. Many of them used to work in the industry they now cover also”